Navigating the Geopolitical Storm: US-Iran conflict impacts global real assets and strategic allocations

► Download the full PDF version of The Iran-US Conflict: Impact and Resilience for Global Real Assets Spotlight report here

► The Restructuring of Global Real Assets 

On 28th February 2026, the US and Israel launched surprise military strikes against Iranian leadership and key infrastructure, abruptly halting ongoing bilateral negotiations. Iran immediately retaliated with widespread attacks across the Middle East targeting US bases and regional allies. 

Crucially for global markets, Iran also closed the Strait of Hormuz, severely disrupting international trade and triggering the macroeconomic and geopolitical shockwaves currently rippling through the global real assets industry.

As the global landscape scrambles to adapt to this new reality, investors in real estate and infrastructure are being forced to reassess their strategic outlooks. 

► Stagflationary Supply-Side Shock 

The current conflict in the Middle East has manifested as a classic supply-side shock, creating an environment of slowing economic growth combined with rising inflation, which poses significant challenges for the global economy. 

Unlike periods of high economic growth where energy prices rise due to increased demand, the current escalation is driven by a constriction in supply. This results in higher energy costs that are not merited by the underlying strength of the global economy.

This stagflationary dynamic causes a profoundly unhelpful scenario for most economic actors:

• Central banks find themselves in a precarious position, struggling to balance the competing mandates of keeping unemployment low while managing sudden inflationary pressures. 
• Central governments face similar complications in balancing budgets and maintaining sustainable debt profiles. 
• Private sector businesses, particularly those in energy-intensive industries, are immediately hit with a significantly higher cost base. 

The inflationary impact is direct and rapid because energy prices are a core component of inflation indices globally. Furthermore, second-round effects are expected to filter through to vital sectors such as the global food system and travel in the coming months.

While the macroeconomic fallout is overwhelmingly negative, there are isolated beneficiaries. Hydrocarbon exporters, military and weapons manufacturers, and domestic producers who can substitute disrupted supply chains stand to gain. 

For instance, the restriction of helium production - a critical component for semiconductor manufacturing traditionally sourced heavily from the Gulf - benefits alternative producers outside the region. 

Similarly, US liquefied natural gas producers benefit as competing supplies from nations such as Qatar face logistical disruptions. However, these winners are the exception rather than the rule.

The duration of this shock is the critical variable. A prolonged closure of key arteries such as the Strait of Hormuz could severely impact global inventories of fertilisers and semiconductors, compounding the crisis. 

Beyond the immediate cyclical effects, the conflict is accelerating long-term structural shifts. The world is moving away from the hyper-efficient, just-in-time global supply chains of the past toward models that prioritise resilience, localism, and the diversification of energy sources.

► Regional Divergence and Capital Reallocation 

The macroeconomic fallout is not distributed equally. Regional economies and real estate markets are diverging based on their energy independence and proximity to the conflict.

The United States 

The US has re-emerged as a traditional safe haven, drawing capital flows back toward the dollar and American assets. This is largely due to the US being geographically distant from the conflict and functioning as a relatively closed economy, with imports comprising only a small fraction of its GDP. 

Crucially, the US is energy independent and a net exporter of energy, shielding it from the worst of the supply shock. Additionally, increased military spending can act as a stimulative force for the domestic economy. 

This influx of capital reverses the narrative from the previous year, which had seen cross-border investment into the US drop to a historic low of 5% - levels not seen since the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). Investors who had been looking toward Europe and APAC are now pivoting back to the relative stability of the US market.

Europe and the United Kingdom 

In stark contrast, Europe and the UK are experiencing significant macroeconomic downgrades as they face the brunt of the fallout. 

The Eurozone is particularly vulnerable due to its heavy reliance on imported oil and gas, which represent a much larger component of energy costs for both households and businesses compared to the US. 

This reliance has necessitated changes to the outlook for monetary policy and interest rates, dampening the prospects for the commercial property sector. Furthermore, Germany's real estate market has seen substantial declines, exacerbated by internal issues surrounding open-ended funds that require further revaluation.

► Join top industry leaders at Europe GRI 2026 in Paris on 9th-10th September to gauge the impact

Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)

Naturally, the GCC faces the most direct exposure to the geopolitical disruption. In the short term, the market has reacted sharply, with the UAE FTSE EPRA Nareit index dropping by 21%. There is a consensus that transaction activity will slow down significantly in the first half of the year due to immediate uncertainty. 

However, the long-term outlook for Dubai remains surprisingly robust. Over the past two decades, Dubai has weathered massive swings and has consistently emerged stronger from global crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war. 

The city has reached a critical mass, functioning as a truly global, multi-ethnic melting pot with highly favourable tax treatments. 

While there may be a temporary dip in luxury residential demand as marginal movers opt to delay their relocations or shift toward alternative hubs such as Singapore, London, or Miami, Dubai is not expected to lose its structural appeal.

► Get expert analysis on how the situation turns out when we gather in Abu Dhabi on 4th-6th November at the GRI Global Summit 2026

APAC and Latam 

In the APAC region, countries including India, South Korea and Singapore are feeling the broader macroeconomic strains, though Singapore is poised to be a modest winner. 

Much like its capitalisation on regional instability in Hong Kong, Singapore's status as a haven of stability makes it an attractive alternative for capital seeking refuge from the Middle East. 

► Assess the fallout for the APAC region at India GRI 2026 in Mumbai on 8th October

Latin America, meanwhile, is positioned as a structural beneficiary by capitalising on the US's desire to nearshore supply chains and reimagine the Monroe Doctrine. 

With reasonable economic stability, deep-water ports, and independent hydrocarbon resources, Latin America is experiencing a mild positive impact, though its geographic distance prevents it from fully stepping in to fill all the gaps left by the Middle Eastern disruption.

► Discover how Latin America is adapting to the changing landscape at Latam GRI 2026 in New York City on 12th-13th May

► Defensive Plays and Emerging Vulnerabilities 

Real estate and infrastructure have historically been viewed as defensive asset classes, but the current geopolitical climate is testing these assumptions. 

The core benefit of direct commercial real estate is that it operates in a slow-moving pricing environment. Unlike liquid public equities, which suffer from intense daily volatility during crises, commercial real estate allows investors to look past short-term uncertainty. 

If the conflict resolves without major long-term impacts on energy infrastructure, the asset class should remain relatively stable, though with a slight downgrade in rental growth outlooks for consumer-facing sectors.

The Inflation Hedge Debate and Residential Outperformance 

The notion that commercial real estate serves as a universal inflation hedge is heavily contested. 

Rent growth only tracks inflation reliably when a market is perfectly balanced or experiencing unusually low vacancy rates. However, the residential and living sectors demonstrate distinct defensive strengths. 

Consumer demand for housing is less about business cost-minimisation and more directly tied to long-term earnings growth. Over the past twenty-five years, residential rental increases have consistently outperformed other sectors and closely tracked inflation. 

In a stagflationary environment characterised by high inflation and low growth, the housing segment is positioned to stand up exceptionally well.

Infrastructure and Thematic Investments 

Infrastructure has evolved from a purely defensive play into a highly thematic growth engine. This transformation is driven by a massive post-GFC undersupply, the need to reorganise global supply chains, and the explosive capital expenditure cycle surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) and data centres. 

Data centres, in particular, are experiencing unprecedented growth, with the US leading the global market, followed closely by adaptable economies such as Singapore and the UK. 

Beyond digital infrastructure, there is a surging structural interest in alternative real assets. Investors are increasingly pivoting toward self-storage facilities, senior housing, and purpose-built student accommodation as traditional sectors such as office space face long-term technological and cyclical pressures.

Emerging Vulnerabilities 

Despite these strengths, real assets carry unique risks in the current environment. The most obvious is location dependency; physical assets cannot be moved if they find themselves in the path of a geopolitical shock, making geographic diversification non-negotiable. 

Furthermore, real estate is heavily reliant on leverage. The recent dramatic spikes in bond yields have shattered the traditional 60/40 portfolio model, meaning fixed-income and equities are now magnifying each other's downside volatility rather than providing balance. 

As funding costs remain elevated, sectors that are still recovering from the normalisation of post-pandemic interest rates - most notably the US office sector - will continue to struggle.

► The End of the Rules-Based Order 

Looking beyond the immediate cyclical horizon, the industry must grapple with profound structural realities. The conflict has laid bare the vulnerabilities of European energy grids and military supply routes, necessitating a massive domestic build-out of resilient infrastructure.

Simultaneously, the global construction pipeline for traditional commercial real estate is expected to shrink. The dual pressures of higher debt and surging construction material costs are dampening new development. 

This is further exacerbated by rising labour costs, which are being driven up by reduced immigration across many developed markets. 

While this will suppress short-term activity, the resulting constraint on new supply will likely lead to stronger rental growth prospects by the end of the decade.

Perhaps the most sobering conclusion from the discussion is the recognition that sovereign geopolitical risk is no longer an episodic anomaly but a permanent fixture of the global economy. 

The post-Cold War era - characterised by artificially depressed geopolitical risk and a reliable, US-led rules-based order - has effectively collapsed. The global economy is fracturing into distinct, competing spheres of influence centred around the US and China, leaving an increasing number of unaligned nations to navigate the middle ground. 

In this newly volatile world, the physical realities of real estate and the strategic necessity of infrastructure will demand an unprecedented level of rigorous, defensively minded portfolio construction.

► Real-Time Investor Sentiment 

During the virtual roundtable, three live polls were conducted, offering a real-time snapshot of how leading investors are navigating this complex landscape. 

The overwhelming sentiment is one of caution, a preference for liquidity, and a reluctance to make sudden, sweeping changes.

Poll 1: Capital Allocation Drivers 

When participants were asked what factors will most influence where real asset capital is allocated over the next 12-18 months, the results clearly illustrated a flight to safety.

• A commanding majority of 53% cited a preference for established, liquid core markets.
• 22% of respondents are seeking value through market dislocations and repricing.
• Only 18% favour growth-oriented strategies in emerging regions.
• A mere 7% are focused on capitalising on sectors linked to energy and resources.

Poll 2: The Role of Real Assets in Portfolio Resilience

The second poll explored the fundamental purpose of real estate and infrastructure within modern portfolios today. The responses validated the defensive reputation of the sector.

• Exactly 50% affirmed that these asset classes remain core pillars of stability and income generation.
• Another 31% indicated they are taking a more nuanced approach, favouring selective exposure depending on sector fundamentals.
• Only 13% view real assets as being increasingly linked to broader global trends and risks.
• 6% are still being reassessed in light of evolving conditions.

Poll 3: Strategic Adaptation 

The final poll asked how investors are adapting their real assets strategy to a more dynamic global environment. The results showcased a profoundly steady hand among institutional leaders.

• The largest cohort, 34%, is maintaining a long-term strategy with minimal changes.
• A closely aligned 31% are observing trends before making major adjustments.
• Furthermore, 25% are refining and stress-testing existing approaches.
• Only a marginal 9% are fundamentally reshaping their investment frameworks.

► Navigating the New Paradigm 

The US-Iran conflict has injected a severe stagflationary shock into an already complex global economy. 

While the immediate macroeconomic impacts are challenging - characterised by rising inflation, elevated bond yields, and disrupted supply chains - the real estate and infrastructure sectors continue to offer crucial defensive advantages. 

As evidenced by both expert analysis and real-time investor polling, the strategy moving forward is not one of panic, but of calculated resilience. 

Capital is retreating to established, liquid core markets and safe havens like the United States, while simultaneously pivoting toward structurally supported alternative sectors such as data centres, logistics, and residential living. 

As the global order fractures, geopolitical risk assessment is no longer a peripheral consideration; it is the absolute core of long-term real asset investment strategy.

► Stay updated on the latest developments impacting the real estate and infrastructure industries at the GRI Institute’s upcoming events
 

---

These insights were shared during the GRI Institute’s The Iran-US Conflict: Impact and Resilience for Global Real Assets virtual roundtable, featuring expert analysis from David Stubbs, Chief Investment Strategist at AlphaCorp, and Kiran Raichura, Chief Commercial Real Estate Economist at Capital Economics.