Indian CRE Shifts to “Workspitality” as Hybrid Work Forces Campus Redesign

Moving beyond the gym and cafeteria checklist to solving the specific design conflicts between open retail and corporate security protocols.

February 16, 2026Real Estate
Written by:Jorge Aguinaga

Key Takeaways

  • Building amenities without an external footfall strategy creates after-hours ghost towns; successful campuses must now separate public-facing retail from secure tenant zones to ensure commercial viability.
  • Despite the push for open campuses, global tenants still demand fortress-level security, forcing developers to design "sterile zones" that segregate sensitive operations from public lifestyle areas.
  • The shift of domestic functions (eating, socialising) to the office requires a technical upgrade in base-build specs, specifically higher MEP loads for wet pantries and waste systems on tenant floors.

The "Energisation" Failure in Modern Parks

While developers frequently market lifestyle ecosystems, the operational reality often falls short. Simply building a food court or a gym is a capital expenditure, not a solution. 

The critical missing link is "energisation" - the active curation of these spaces to prevent them from becoming "ghost towns" post-6 PM.

Without a programmed calendar and a strategy to attract footfall beyond the immediate tenant employees, these amenities become commercially unsustainable.

A cafeteria that operates only from 9-to-6 forces tenants to build their own internal pantries, duplicating infrastructure and wasting valuable floor plate efficiency.

The Fortress vs. The Public Square

A major design conflict has emerged between the desire for vibrant, mixed-use environments and the strict security mandates of global occupiers.

While the ideal campus integrates with the city fabric (retail, breweries, public access), many Fortune 500 tenants remain worried about physical and data security. They explicitly reject buildings where the public or media have unvetted access to the ground plane.

This forces a design rethink: future campuses must create distinct "sterile zones" for secure operations while pushing public amenities to the perimeter, rather than attempting a seamless (and often rejected) blend of public and private flow.

The "Pantry" as the New Kitchen

The function of the office has shifted from a place of production to a primary source of sustenance. With younger demographics (Gen Z) increasingly relying on office infrastructure for meals rather than cooking at home, the "pantry" has effectively replaced the domestic kitchen.

This is not a soft perk but a hard design requirement. It demands significantly higher load capacities for wet pantries, specialised exhaust systems, and increased waste management protocols on tenant floors - technical specifications that older base-builds frequently fail to support, forcing costly retrofits.

Designing for the Ghost Days

The hybrid work model has introduced a new volatility in campus utilisation: the "Tuesday-Thursday peak" versus the "Monday-Friday drop."

Operations teams are struggling to manage this fluctuation, where a campus must be fully staffed and energised for peak days but feels empty on others. The design solution lies in flexible, modular spaces and services that can scale up or down daily.

This requires a shift from fixed hard infrastructure to soft service layers, where hospitality partners can adjust food and beverage output dynamically based on real-time occupancy data, preventing the operational bleed of running a full-capacity campus for a half-empty building.
 
You need to be logged-in to download this content.